<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>jac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnacraft.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnacraft.com</link>
	<description>&#34;Pete, it&#039;s a fool that looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart.&#34; - U. E. McGill</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:09:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<cloud domain='johnacraft.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>This week in Network Neutrality</title>
		<link>http://johnacraft.com/2010/08/21/this-week-in-network-neutrality/</link>
		<comments>http://johnacraft.com/2010/08/21/this-week-in-network-neutrality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnacraft.com/?p=525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been a few months since I&#8217;ve mused aloud about the FCC&#8217;s actions on network neutrality. During that time Google and Verizon released their joint proposal, which was met with reaction from just about everyone. Based on comments this week by Commissioners Michael Copps and Mignon Clyburn, The Google / Verizon proposal is not getting [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://johnacraft.com/2010/08/21/this-week-in-network-neutrality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cyanogen Mod</title>
		<link>http://johnacraft.com/2010/07/12/cyanogen-mod/</link>
		<comments>http://johnacraft.com/2010/07/12/cyanogen-mod/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnacraft.com/?p=454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update: Apparently Devin Coldewey can read my mind. Original post: I spent a bit of time over the weekend playing with the latest version of the Cyanogen ROM for the T-Mobile G1, which aims to bring Android 2.2 to the first Android phone. It&#8217;s still a bit bleeding-edge-ish for me, so I reverted back to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://johnacraft.com/2010/07/12/cyanogen-mod/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What just happened?</title>
		<link>http://johnacraft.com/2010/05/25/what-just-happened/</link>
		<comments>http://johnacraft.com/2010/05/25/what-just-happened/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 18:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnacraft.com/?p=400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNET: A bipartisan group of politicians on Monday told FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, in no uncertain terms, to abandon his plans to impose controversial new rules on broadband providers until the U.S. Congress changes the law. Seventy-four House Democrats sent Genachowski, an Obama appointee and fellow Democrat, a letter saying his ideas will &#8220;jeopardize jobs&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://johnacraft.com/2010/05/25/what-just-happened/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Channel-Free TV</title>
		<link>http://johnacraft.com/2010/05/20/channel-free-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://johnacraft.com/2010/05/20/channel-free-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 17:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnacraft.com/?p=396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my last post, I made the following comment: the cable industry is facing a big change. Cable’s current business model looks a lot like broadcast – it’s based on channels, and many content providers pay for their channel. But its future business model is on-demand, and looks a lot like . . . Bittorrent. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://johnacraft.com/2010/05/20/channel-free-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Noll on &#8216;network neutrality&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://johnacraft.com/2010/05/19/michael-noll-on-network-neutrality/</link>
		<comments>http://johnacraft.com/2010/05/19/michael-noll-on-network-neutrality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 13:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnacraft.com/?p=387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Michael Noll has a succint column which puts the FCC&#8217;s recent decision in historical perspective: Telecommunication networks are telecommunication services whether they carry voice, video, or data signals, and should be regulated and treated as common carriers. The information accessed over telecommunication networks are information, computing, or entertainment services and should not be regulated. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://johnacraft.com/2010/05/19/michael-noll-on-network-neutrality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mark Zuckerberg&#8217;s having a bad day</title>
		<link>http://johnacraft.com/2010/05/13/mark-zuckerbergs-having-a-bad-day/</link>
		<comments>http://johnacraft.com/2010/05/13/mark-zuckerbergs-having-a-bad-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 20:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnacraft.com/?p=377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update: Today isn&#8217;t any better: This may seem like a bad way to treat customers, but the whole point about Facebook is that users aren&#8217;t customers. Anyone who supposes that Facebook&#8217;s users are its customer has got the business model precisely backwards. Users pay nothing, because we aren&#8217;t customers, but product. The customers are the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://johnacraft.com/2010/05/13/mark-zuckerbergs-having-a-bad-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The FCC to act on Network Neutrality?</title>
		<link>http://johnacraft.com/2010/05/06/the-fcc-to-act-on-network-neutrality/</link>
		<comments>http://johnacraft.com/2010/05/06/the-fcc-to-act-on-network-neutrality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 14:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnacraft.com/?p=361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: Statement here. Under this narrow and tailored approach, the Commission would: * Recognize the transmission component of broadband access service—and only this component—as a telecommunications service; * Apply only a handful of provisions of Title II (Sections 201, 202, 208, 222, 254, and 255) that, prior to the Comcast decision, were widely believed to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://johnacraft.com/2010/05/06/the-fcc-to-act-on-network-neutrality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palm &#8211; is the end near?</title>
		<link>http://johnacraft.com/2010/04/12/palm-is-the-end-near/</link>
		<comments>http://johnacraft.com/2010/04/12/palm-is-the-end-near/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnacraft.com/?p=354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: HP has acquired Palm For $1.2 Billion. More here. Bloomberg says it is: Palm Inc., creator of the Pre smartphone, is seeking bids for the company as early as this week, according to three people familiar with the situation. I tend to agree with this Engadget editorial, primarily on the patent angle. Palm&#8217;s intellectual [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://johnacraft.com/2010/04/12/palm-is-the-end-near/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>STS-131</title>
		<link>http://johnacraft.com/2010/04/05/sts-131/</link>
		<comments>http://johnacraft.com/2010/04/05/sts-131/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 11:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnacraft.com/?p=339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow. Update: A better photo. Since this launch is being hailed as the most beautiful ever, here&#8217;s the view of the contrail residue as seen from the Sunoco in Titusville 30 minutes after liftoff: Also, shortly before the launch, the International Space Station passed over the launch platform. We saw it, thinking it to be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://johnacraft.com/2010/04/05/sts-131/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Still the greatest prank ever</title>
		<link>http://johnacraft.com/2010/04/01/still-the-greatest-prank-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://johnacraft.com/2010/04/01/still-the-greatest-prank-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnacraft.com/?p=334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.youtube.com/watch?v=27ugSKW4-QQ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://johnacraft.com/2010/04/01/still-the-greatest-prank-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
